Russian news is reporting that Eric Braverman actually has seek sought asylum at the Russian consulate office former CEO to Clinton foundation
Eric Link http://alexey43.livejournal.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTs2Hg9oLS4
Tyler Dyrden wrote this article.
We have written frequently about the internal
Clinton Foundation power struggle between Chelsea Clinton and Doug Band over
the previous couple of weeks (see here, here and here). It all
started back in 2011 when, as Chelsea
started to take a more senior role at the Clinton Foundation, she became
increasingly concerned about an internal audit that exposed glaring conflicts of interest throughout the Foundation with an emphasis on Doug Band
and his company, Teneo, who she thought had inappropriately sought favors from
the State Department during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State.
A Politico article from March 2015, summarized
Chelsea's rise at the Foundation and how it threatened some long-time Clinton
allies who had grown quite accustomed to the status quo.
But Chelsea Clinton’s rise at times
has seemed to threaten some veteran Clinton aides who had carved out
influential—and lucrative—positions after long service with her parents. She is blamed in some quarters for marginalizing both Lindsey and
Doug Band, who rose from the president’s body man to build and help run the
foundation’s Clinton Global Initiative. A third Clinton veteran, Ira Magaziner, saw his
portfolio at the foundation diminished during Braverman’s tenure, and sources say
Magaziner’s role remains under scrutiny.
Now, new WikiLeaks emails reveal additional
details behind the the man, Eric Braverman, who was brought in as CEO by
Chelsea to change the controversial practices of the Foundation but abruptly resigned a short time
later after being pushed out by long-time Clinton loyalists who had apparently
grown very comfortable with the status quo.
Below is the new email exchange which begins
when Neera Tanden warns John Podesta
to "keep tabs on Doug Band" who she assumed was the insider who told
NBC to "follow the money and find the real HRC scandal."
Interestingly, John Podesta writes back quickly to identify the real source as former Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman which seems to be shocking to Tanden
who replies simply, "Holy Moses."
So who
is Eric Braverman? The following excerpts from a Politico article offer the best summary of
Braverman and his efforts, as a newly installed CEO, to breakup the Clinton
Foundation scandal machine only to be pushed
out by Clinton loyalists after only a year and a half in his new position.
In
December [2014], the board of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation
approved a salary of more than $395,000, plus bonus, for its Yale-educated CEO,
Eric Braverman, while voting to extend his board term through 2017, according
to sources familiar with the arrangement. Braverman, who had worked with
Chelsea Clinton at the prestigious McKinsey & Company consultancy, had been brought in with the
former first daughter’s support to help impose McKinsey-like management rigor
to a foundation that had grown into a $2 billion charitable powerhouse.
But
in January, only weeks after the board's show of support and just a year and a
half after Braverman arrived, he abruptly resigned, and sources tell
Politico his exit stemmed partly from a power struggle inside the foundation
between and among the coterie of Clinton loyalists who have surrounded the
former president for decades and who helped start and run the foundation.Some, including the president’s old Arkansas lawyer Bruce
Lindsey, who preceded Braverman as CEO,raised
concerns directly to Bill Clinton about the reforms implemented by Braverman,
according to sources, and felt themselves marginalized by the growing influence
of Chelsea Clinton and the new CEO she had helped recruit.
The previously untold saga of Braverman’s brief,
and occasionally fraught tenure trying to navigate the Clintons’ insular world
highlights the challenges the family has faced trying to impose rigorous
oversight onto a vast global foundation that relies on some of the same loyal
megadonors Hillary Clinton will need for the presidential run sources have said
she is all but certain to launch later this year.
Already,
a spate of recent news stories in Politico and elsewhere have highlighted
questions about thefoundation’s aggressive
fundraising both before and during Braverman’s tenure, including the news
that the foundation had been accepting contributions from foreign governments
with lax oversight from the State Department when Hillary Clinton was
secretary of state. The
foundation has been Clinton’s main public platform since she left State in
February 2013.
The
hiring a few months later of Braverman, who had been a partner in McKinsey’s
Washington office, was seen as validation
of Chelsea Clinton’s view that the foundation needed to address recommendations
from a 2011 audit for tighter governance and budgeting, as well as more
comprehensive policies to vet donors and avoid conflicts of interest.
When
Braverman arrived to replace Lindsey as CEO, he moved quickly to adopt the
auditor’s recommendations, and
then some. He diversified
the foundation’s board beyond the Clintons and their longtime political allies
and restructured its finance department. He oversaw the creation of a $250
million endowment and implemented data-driven analytics to measure the
effectiveness of foundation programs.
No
public explanation was offered for Braverman’s resignation.
Of course, given that the email exchange between
Podesta and Tanden, and the following tweet from NBC's Joe Scarborough,
occurred just days after Braverman was relieved of his duties in March 2015 it does seem likely that he was
the "source close to the Clintons" who told Ron Fournier "to
follow the money and find the real HRC scandal."
"@JoeNBC:
A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to "follow the
money" and find the real HRC scandal. http://t.co/lPTQY0L0o4"
Ironically, Braverman's resignation also came
shortly after the following email from Huma Abedin showing that Hillary directly approached the
King of Morocco to host a meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative.
In return, the King
had promised "$12 million both for the endowment and to support the
meeting." Huma concludes her email by saying "she [Hillary] created
this mess and she knows it."
So was this the questionable "contribution from foreign
governments with lax oversight" that
ultimately caused Braverman to resign?
More importantly, where is Eric Braverman
now? Clearly, at one point, Braverman expressed some interest in exposing
the deep corruption within the Clinton Foundation...now, with all of the new
WikiLeaks disclosures, would seem like an opportune time to do just that.
If the war
whore is elected there is a good chance that this infighting will cause her
administration to be ineffective.
.
ATTENTION ERIC : it is your duty to
expose this dirty sociopathic elitist criminal cunt NOW (before the
election)...especially if you have young children/nieces/nephews that you care
about.
TRUMP 2016.
he's
probably off somewhere on some beach...with a nailgun...feeling
suicide-y.
Tragic
chainsaw accident, kicked back and decapitated him . . .
So much
Truth being dumped on Wikileaks Twitter account right now. Everything is
being exposed. I smell revoluiton.
ZH, you just
may have put a price on his head with this
Conspiracies are being exposed so quickly they
dont even have time become theories. Damn conspiracy theorists are going
to be out of work pretty soon.
This is
typical corporate culture of organization in pursuit of illgotten treasure
through graft and corruption.
If Braverman
is going to squeel like a pig on the Clinton Foundation he had better
hurry. There isn't much time left and we need a big scandal story from a
reputable source on Benedict Hillary.
You guys
have probably seen this one but here is a clinton staffer handing his phone to
Andrea Mithchel to give her the next question. Unfucking belivealble.
Hillary Gets
Scripted Question from MSNBC During Press Conference After Debate
James Okeefe if tweeting he fears for his
life. He has a bombshell proving shillary and donna connected to
trump violence.
Also he filed a law suit for domestic terrorism
and voter fraud against hillary and the dnc.
This guy served on Obama's transitional team in
2009:
If he cracks
and spills the beans on the Clintons, he likely saw how complicit the Obamas
are will all this. No telling what the guy might say.
SYSTEM IS CORRUPT, RIGGED ...
What more evidence is Needed ???
Everybody (In Power) just sitting on their flat
A$$ doing sweet Shit about it...
dead man
walking.
He's a Braverman than I am, going up against
the Clintons.
$400K/yr? Damn- Chelsea makes $3.3M at
a lesser post- he should sue for wage discrimination........
I nominate
this as the official song of RevWar3.0
If it keeps
on rainin' levee's gonna break
p.s. it will be poetically ironic if hillary is
brought down in part because chelsea tried to stop breaking the law so much.
"he
filed a law suit for domestic terrorism and voter fraud against hillary and the
dnc."
If they they
think they will lose, they will settle...and the shenanigans continue.
Poor guy thought he was going to work for a
charity...and then found out it was actualy an international organized crime
ring.
"....To
informed analysts, the Clinton Foundation appears to be a rogue charity that has
neither been
organized nor operated lawfully from inception in October 1997 todate--as you will grow to
realize, it is a case study in international charity fraud, ofmammoth proportions. In particular, the Clinton
Foundation has never been validly authorized to pursuetax-exempt purposes other than
as a presidential archive and research facility basedin Little Rock, Arkansas.
Moreover, its operations have never been controlled byindependent trustees and its
financial results have never been properly audited byindependent accountants..."
Perhaps
others' ideas that is it just a slush payment fund by TPTB to Shill and
Slickdick for services rendered.
They could
have kept it under wraps, but Hitlary is too greedy. She hangs with
Rothschilds, starts thinking she is one of them, but is really only hired help.
Think of it
this way. She is ordered to do stuff as SoS for TPTB. Not content with a few
million and a lot of power, she goes Rogue, using her office to personally
obtain MORE money and More power, outside of the orders prescribed by TPTB.
Not unlike a
Mafia Capo skimming the top off the profits to the Godfather.
Eventually
the Godfather finds out, and Whack!
"To understand the full extent of illegal activities
involving Clinton Foundationentities and personnel, you must resist unvetted words and
numbers published inpress
releases, marketing brochures, and filings to state, federal, and foreigngovernments, the latter having
been submitted under penalties of perjury."
~"If Braverman is going to
squeel like a pig on the Clinton Foundation he had better hurry."~
My thinking
exactly. Where's he going to run to? Who'll hire him now? I hope he doesn't own
any pneumatic construction tools...
another
thought: It makes you wonder how things are playing out between Chelsea and the
"old Clinton hands". It's got to be a lot like being old Kim Jong
-Il's old staff after Kim Jong-Un took over. Sooner or later, (and usually much
sooner), the kid starts whacking the old help. Even "retiring" could
be dicey.
"If Braverman is going to
squeel like a pig on the Clinton Foundation he had better hurry."
What would
really be profound, is a cell phone video of Hillary flying into an
uncontrolled rage. Her bad temperment would be right out in the open for all to
see.
People would
be shocked.
Bought off
with a mansion and then turns?
Not
recommended, Bernie.
The bitch
doesn't like being crossed, or haven't you noticed the bodycount?
Is Julian Assange alive?
1. codes tweeted
2. internet cut
3. Armed police outside embassy
4. London airport shut and evacuated for 3
yrs yesterday for some phony chemical attack
5. Twitter goes down Friday morning
6. Organizational changes tweeted out today
7. whenever organizational changes are made
Assanges comes out on the balcony to make the announcement.
8. regular wikileaks followers said it was acting
strange for a few days, vibe and tone off
Makes sense
hillary and a obummer would co-opt wikileaks twitter and web site leaking out
one final batch of fake emails to say claim all the emails are faked.
Sounds like assange has been rendered. Wikileaks should have noted how
many parts they were going to leak, like saying Podesta emails 1 of 25, etc.
Hopefully
Okeefe if he is still alive by monday will have a something to bring shillary
down.
Trump IS the
revolution
He is the
symptom.
They would
dearly love to Kennedy him, but cast fearful glances at the silent mob behind
him.
2008, Obama
to Wall St: I'm the only thing between you and the Mob outside.
2016, Trump
and Hillary to Wall St: I am the only one between you and the Revolutionary
Masses.
Not true. He
is presently the only relief valve for millions of Americans, and a really
shitty one at that.
This was
here before Trump, and will be here after Trump.
yes, but
does it even matter if it's not on MSM? Most people will probably not even see
it... At least, not reading anything at all in EU-zone.
trick is to
get things so bad (ie, even worse) that even MSM starts to take some distance
from their Fuhrer Frau Hillary. Just one little crack in a newspaper could
trigger an interesting avalance. Unless MSM starts to publish, most sheeple
will only see it as propaganda/interference from those nasty trump supporters
and the evil world outside the US.
Just my two
cents, of course, but there is always a wavering point that even the most
ardant clinton supporter will make an about face.
Why is it all of a sudden everyone is being exposed
now
Therefore judge nothing before
the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring
to light the hidden things
of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then
shall every man have praise of God
No comments:
Post a Comment